Luiss’s Transition Towards Open Science: A Look at the Italian Landscape

The Italian landscape of Open Science reflects a structural complexity still in flux, shaped by local experimentation, institutional accelerations, and regulatory uncertainties. Twenty years after the 2003 Berlin Declaration and the subsequent 2004 Messina Declaration — which laid the foundation for an open science culture in Italy — the national university system is gradually aligning its research publication and evaluation models with the principles of Open Access. These early formal commitments to open science, initially focused on providing free access to research outputs, have since evolved into a broader conceptual shift encompassing the entire scientific production cycle.

A crucial milestone in this transition is represented by the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA), which has had a significant impact both internationally and within Italy since 2012. Addressed to all stakeholders in the research system—funding agencies, publishers, institutions, and researchers—the declaration calls for a radical change in how scientific quality is assessed, moving beyond the exclusive use of bibliometric indicators, and promoting broader, more transparent and inclusive criteria that acknowledge the diversity of contributions to knowledge.

Within this framework, and alongside the “Green Open Access” route, the “Diamond Open Access” model has gained traction across Europe and internationally. Today, it represents a preferred path for many universities and research centers, including those in Italy. The Diamond Open Access Action Plan, launched in March 2022 by a consortium including Science Europe, OPERAS, and cOAlition S, outlines a non-commercial publishing ecosystem that is free for both authors and readers, supported by scholarly communities and grounded in the principles of bibliodiversity, equity, and sustainability. It is estimated that there are between 17,000 and 29,000 active Diamond journals worldwide, which account for approximately 45% of all open-access publications. However, this model remains fragile, hindered by infrastructural, managerial, and financial challenges that require systemic and coordinated support.

In Italy, the adoption of these principles progresses at varying speeds, often driven by local initiatives led by universities and networks of academic libraries. The result is a fragmented landscape where the transformative potential of Open Science must contend with administrative constraints, evolving funding models, and the need for a clearer regulatory framework. It is within this dynamic context that the transformation underway at Luiss is situated: a university committed — also through the European CATALISI project — to making Open Science a strategic pillar of its research policies.

With the specific features of a private university structured into five departments — Law, Political Science, Economics and Finance, Business and Management, and AI, Data and Decision Sciences —Luiss is strongly oriented toward innovation and international engagement. In this context, the university has embarked on a gradual integration of Open Science principles into its research strategy. The Diamond Open Access model offers a particularly promising perspective in this process: its financial sustainability — ensured by public or institutional funding — makes it a potentially compatible solution for both Luiss and Luiss University Press. This model can support open access, multilingual, and bibliodiverse academic publishing initiatives. Luiss’s support for this model unfolds along three main lines: concrete support for faculty throughout the publication process; continuous cultural awareness-raising; and the operational facilitation of publishing, which includes participation in transformative agreements as well as structured use of institutional repositories.

Transformative agreements — negotiated at the national level by CARE-CRUI, the Coordination Group for Access to Electronic Resources within the Conference of Italian University Rectors — intend to convert traditional journal subscription models into agreements that include Open Access publishing fees. These agreements, signed on behalf of all Luiss-affiliated faculty members, including non-tenured academics, cover publication with some of the world’s leading publishers, such as Elsevier, Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, and Springer Nature. Luiss’s participation in these agreements reflects a pragmatic and incremental approach: on the one hand, the University supports the structural experimentation required by the Diamond model; on the other, it ensures continuity in the accessibility and dissemination of its research output through well-established publishing channels, while awaiting the emergence of new systemic solutions.

Luiss’s early interest in an inclusive and responsible approach to science was evident in its initial adoption of institutional repositories aimed at collecting and enhancing the visibility of faculty research outputs. The university’s first bibliographic archive, U-GOV RICERCA — later replaced by IRIS, the Institutional Research Information System — marked a foundational step toward building a stable database for open access to research products. Adopted in 2014 and gradually extended to include PhD candidates and research fellows, IRIS now enables the systematic collection of Luiss’s scholarly output, in compliance with editorial policies and copyright regulations. It is also interoperable with major national and European databases, including those of the Ministry of University and Research (MIUR) and OpenAIRE. This repository, compliant with international standards on metadata and open access, has over time become not only the official archive of the university’s scientific output but also the central tool for assessing the quality of research conducted by Luiss faculty and researchers. IRIS serves as the platform for the Internal Research Evaluation, VIR, an annual, transparent, and participatory procedure that allocates individual research funds based on the quality of uploaded publications. These are assessed using criteria aligned with the national Research Quality Assessment (VQR) and shared with other academic communities. Thus, IRIS functions not only as a repository of information but also as a strategic lever for promoting more transparent, traceable, and open research practices. It marks a shift from a purely archival logic to a true governance model for research data and metrics.

To support this ongoing evolution towards a more open and informed management of research, the University had already adopted its first Open Access policy in 2016. Through a synergistic collaboration between the Research and Third Mission Office and the University Library, archiving practices have progressively become a concrete expression of a growing sensitivity to the principles of Open Science. In view of the upcoming 2026 VIR assessment, covering the evaluation period 2023–2025, a new self-declared and verifiable field will be introduced in the repository to track the availability of the publisher’s version of a publication in Open Access. This data will become an integral part of the reward allocation system, thus providing a concrete incentive for the adoption of open publishing practices.

As highlighted by Annalisa D’Agostino, Head of the Research and Third Mission Office, this decision responds to new requirements set by European funding frameworks, particularly Horizon Europe, which mandates public access to research results from applying to the call for grants. As noted by the University Library, the integration of the Open Access parameter into the VIR reflects a dual awareness: on the one hand, the need to comply with European guidelines; on the other, the desire to foster internal cultural change by recognizing and rewarding those who adopt more open and responsible dissemination strategies.

In addition to revising research evaluation metrics, Luiss complements its technical support with a structured and strategic approach to raising awareness within the academic community. Since 2025, the Research and Third Mission Office has enhanced its communication efforts through the launch of the Open Science Corner — a dedicated section within the Research and Third Mission Newsbook, Luiss’s research magazine — offering regular updates from the Open Science community, along with practical tools and resources for conducting research. This complements the periodic promotion of relevant calls for papers, events, and conferences in the field of Open Science. Since 2022, Third Mission initiatives have also increasingly integrated Open Science into faculty and management staff seminars and training opportunities. Among the most significant was the 2023 seminar “Open Science from A to Z”, where Elena Giglia, Head of the Open Science Project Unit at the University of Turin, provided a multi-session overview of the current research assessment landscape — still heavily influenced by impact factors and the commercialization of open access — and introduced more equitable and sustainable alternatives.

To further consolidate this approach, Luiss University Press, under the direction of Daniele Rosa, supports the Tesi d’eccellenza (“Theses of Excellence”) project, which showcases the best undergraduate theses by Luiss students through free and accessible publication since 2013. Luiss University Press has also introduced Teaching Cases since 2019, and Luiss Case Studies since 2023, which are fully downloadable and available in Open Access. These efforts contribute to the development of an editorial infrastructure fully aligned with the principles of Open Science.

Underscoring its systemic commitment, Luiss held a strategic meeting in late May between the Research and Third Mission Office, the Library, and Sebastiano Sali, Community Manager of OAPEN — the world’s largest virtual library for Open Access books. In response to OAPEN’s interest in understanding and strengthening the Open Access ecosystem in Italy, Luiss viewed this exchange as a starting point for an internal reflection aimed at updating its institutional Open Access policy. The goal is to align with European standards and provide Luiss University with a policy framework suited to the mature phase of its Open Science journey.

Learn more about Luiss success story under the CATALISI project in this link

University of Gdańsk’s MML Workshop and Twinning Exchange

The University of Gdańsk recently hosted two significant events as part of the CATALISI project: a Mobilisation and Mutual Learning (MML) workshop and a Twinning Exchange. Both initiatives focused on strengthening the societal engagement and “third mission” of higher education institutions, fostering collaboration, and sharing best practices in knowledge transfer and stakeholder involvement. 

MML Workshop: Social Engagement in Higher Education
The MML Workshop, titled “Social engagement in Higher Education: Building stakeholders cooperations and reaching out to external partners,” with the representatives from academia (including a Vice-Dean, administrative staff, and researchers), a policy body/governmental institution, civil society organisation , and 3 managers from industry.  The workshop aimed to enhance societal engagement in higher education by fostering strong cooperation between universities and external partners such as businesses, schools, NGOs, and public institutions. A central theme was exploring the university’s “third mission”—its role in contributing to society beyond traditional teaching and research. Key topics included: 
  • Best Practices: The event showcased the university’s successful educational outreach initiatives, particularly the Logistics and Forwarding Olympiad, a national competition involving over a hundred external stakeholders.  
  • Co-creation Workshops: Participants identified key barriers to stakeholder engagement, such as administrative constraints, differing expectations, and lack of incentives. They co-developed solutions and tools to overcome these obstacles, including improved partnership models and targeted communication strategies.
  • Business Engagement: The session explored how universities can build and sustain partnerships with the private sector. This highlighted the importance of mutual understanding and shared value creation, with discussions on how businesses can support academic activities, foster innovation, and contribute to regional development. 
Twinning Exchange: Public Engagement and Open Science

The exchange primarily focused on public engagement with and outreach to society to solve social challenges, with a specific emphasis on Open Science practices. Highlights included: 

  • Faculty of Economics Tour: The event began with a session at the Faculty of Economics, showcasing the university’s actions for society, including tours of labs, student areas, and discussions on the Experts Council and other initiatives. 
  • Open Science at the University Library: Participants visited the University Library to learn about Open Science initiatives and society-oriented projects. Participants shared different perspectives and good practices for disseminating research findings openly to the general public. 
  • Dissemination: Visits to the Mini-Museum of Amber and the University Radio Mors studio demonstrated innovative ways to leverage academic spaces and media platforms for broader public engagement, promoting the concept of a “university for society.” 

Both the MML workshop and the Twinning Exchange at the University of Gdańsk demonstrated a strong commitment to advancing the societal engagement and “third mission” of higher education institutions. The events improve knowledge transfer and enhance institutional transformation. The University of Gdańsk plans to integrate these insights into its institutional strategy, and aims to replicate the successful MML workshop format for other strategic initiatives in the future. 

CATALISI success story | UJI is Transforming Research Ethos: Open Science and the Reform of Ethical Governance

Castelló de la Plana, Spain – Universitat Jaume I (UJI) is transforming research practices, fostering a culture of research integrity, ethics, and open science. 

This commitment was highlighted in a recent webinar featuring Ramón A. Feenstra and Laura Bernal Sánchez from UJI, who shared their university’s success story under the framework of the CATALISI project.

UJI’s initiatives are designed to strengthen research ethics and open science, aligning with the National Open Science Strategy (ENCA) and aiming to boost transparency, quality, and reproducibility in research. The webinar provided a look into the challenges faced and the solutions implemented by the university.

Laura Bernal Sanchez explains UJI´s problems, needs and inspiration
  • Improvements in ethical reviews

Laura Bernal Sánchez, secretary for various research ethics committees at UJI, detailed the increase in applications for ethical review. From 81 human research applications and 7 animal experimentation applications in 2020, the numbers soared to a combined total of 1038 applications in 2024. While acknowledging this surge as a positive indicator of researchers’ growing awareness of ethics and integrity, Bernal Sánchez highlighted the strain it placed on existing resources.

To address the overwhelming workload and maintain efficiency, UJI has implemented significant changes to its ethics review process. Inspired by practices observed at the University of Amsterdam, UJI transitioned to a peer-review model for project assessment, preceded by technical evaluations in ethical and data protection aspects. This shift has dramatically reduced review times for both the committee and researchers, a crucial improvement given the increasing complexity of research projects.

  • Development of a chatbot

Another innovative solution is development of a chatbot. This tool aims to provide immediate answers to frequently asked questions, freeing up valuable committee time. Bernal Sánchez emphasised that while not AI-driven to avoid potential misinformation, the chatbot’s design allows for the identification of new or recurring questions, informing future updates and guidance.

  • Code of Good Research

Addressing the growing complexity of research, particularly in areas like Artificial Intelligence, UJI is proactively integrating these new topics into its Code of Good Research Practices and doctoral programmes. This ongoing process, informed by national and European regulations (such as the EU’s AI Act and animal welfare guidelines) and collaborations with other institutions, ensures that the university’s ethical framework remains current and relevant.

Ramón A. Feenstra discuss UJI´s efforts in Open Science and the reform of the evaluation system

Ramón A. Feenstra underscored the critical importance of institutional involvement, stressing that successful change requires the full commitment of university leadership.

UJI has developed and approved comprehensive action plans for both Open Science and research assessment, extending beyond the CATALISI project’s duration until 2027. These plans, available in Valencian, Spanish, and English, demonstrate UJI’s long-term dedication to these transformative pathways.

  • Survey on Open Science knowledge

A key initiative under these plans was a comprehensive survey conducted in late 2024. With 330 responses, the survey provided valuable data on researchers’ knowledge, interests, and concerns regarding Open Science and research assessment. Feenstra highlighted the importance of understanding academics’ perspectives, especially given Spain’s historically metrics-driven evaluation system. 

Despite critical views of quantity-focused evaluation systems, researchers continue to rely heavily on traditional metrics. Highly Valued Indicators: 

– Impact Factor | Avg. score: 3.96 

– Number of Citations | Avg. score: 3.87 

-Number of Articles in English | Avg. score: 3.74

The researcher´s awareness of DORA and CoARA is still limited. Despite openness to reforming research assessment and Open Access, their knowledge of key international initiatives is low among UJI researchers. 

-Average Knowledge Scores: DORA (San Francisco Declaration): 2.08 

– CoARA (Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment): 1.96

The survey’s findings offer crucial guidance for tailoring future initiatives to better support researchers.

Both speakers emphasised that UJI’s journey is a “work in progress.” Future efforts will focus on increasing resources, establishing a new biosafety committee, further strengthening integrity structures, and enhancing local and national ethics networks. Continuous improvement in research integrity awareness through training courses and webinars remains a top priority.

UJI’s experience under the CATALISI project serves as a compelling model for other institutions grappling with similar challenges. By proactively addressing the complexities of modern research and fostering a culture of openness and integrity, UJI is setting a commendable standard and contributing significantly to the broader objectives of the European Commission and the European Research Area (ERA) policy.

MML Workshop and Twinning Exchange at Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

On 22nd and 23rd January 2025, the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH) hosted a two day Twinning & Mobilisation and Mutual Learning (MML) Exchange as part of the CATALISI project. This gathering brought together partner institutions including University College Cork (UCC), University of Gdansk (UG), Kaunas University of Technology, Universitat Jaume I | Luiss Guido Carli University, and Amsterdam UMC alongside internal and external stakeholders who have been actively engaging with AUTH’s CATALISI journey. 

MML Workshop: Integrating Open Citizen Science in Universities

The first day focused on an interactive  MML workshops aim to foster knowledge sharing among representatives from different universities. The AUTH team hosted a workshop with the title: Integrating Open Citizen Science in Universities: Building Stakeholder Engagement and Living Lab Ecosystems. They see Open Science and Citizen Science as crucial principles for driving institutional transformation, emphasising stakeholder engagement, transparency, and societal impact through Living Labs and citizen-driven initiatives. 

Main Takeaways: 

  • Explored the effective integration of Open Science and Citizen Science principles into higher education institutions. 
  • Discussed current challenges and future opportunities for incorporating Open and Citizen Science within university systems. 
  • Highlighted the importance of institutional structures that enable openness, collaboration, and broader engagement with society. 
  • Engaged participants in co-creation activities to develop actionable strategies for integrating Open and Citizen Science into AUTH’s ecosystem. 

The final session featured a showcase by Thess-AHALL, the university’s Living Lab, showcasing how researchers and community members can collaborate on real-world settings to address health challenges through co-creation processes. 

Following the hands-on MML workshop, the Twinning session continued the momentum by diving into comparative learning and peer exchange. 

"Twinning Session: Sharing Best Practices for Research Sustainability"

The second day shifted focus toward peer exchange and strategic dialogue between CATALISI partners through the Twinning framework. This format allowed universities to share national experiences and jointly explore pathways to institutional transformation. 

Highlights from the Twinning Event: 

  • Dialogue sessions addressed sustainable research funding and alternative financing models, placing special emphasis on how Open Science practices can be supported long-term. 
  • AUTH provided an overview of the Greek research funding landscape, while UCC and UG shared insights into their national research funding policies. 
  • Case studies highlighted AUTH’s successful project implementations, particularly concerning Living Lab experiences in the medical field. 
  • Interactive sessions fostered a collaborative atmosphere where participants shared challenges in securing and managing funding and proposed practical solutions. 
  • Potential collaborations emerged, including exploring further contact between UCC and UG to pursue avenues discussed during the exchange. 

 

Transforming Higher Education Institutions with CATALISI

These events are organised in the context of the CATALISI Capacity Building and Outreach Acceleration service and are designed to support HEIs with the skills and strategies needed to develop transformative approaches aligned with Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) principles. 

Both the MML Workshop and the Twinning Exchange were successful events. They will contribute positively to AUTH’s journey.  

Kaunas University of Technology Hosts CATALISI Twinning and MML Events

On December 9th and 10th, 2024, Kaunas University of Technology (KTU) in Lithuania hosted to a dual event under the CATALISI framework: a Twinning Exchange and a Mobilisation and Mutual Learning (MML) Workshop. This gathering brought together representatives from various CATALISI Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), including UJI, AUTH, UCC, UG, and LUISS, alongside internal and external stakeholders. 

MML Workshop: Focusing on Participatory Research Practices

The CATALISI MML workshops are designed to foster knowledge sharing among university representatives. KTU’s MML event, titled “Participatory Research Practices at KTU: Infrastructure and Strategic Guidelines,” aimed to discuss the infrastructure, strategic guidance, and real-world applications of citizen science projects across diverse fields. The event saw participation from academics in various roles, from university and faculty-level managers to administrative staff and researchers. 

Main Takeaways: 

  • Introducing Citizen Science Guidelines at KTU: A key focus was the presentation of KTU’s official guidelines for implementing citizen science projects, establishing standards for quality, ethics, and collaboration. 
  • Activities of the Citizen Science Hub: The workshop introduced the hub’s role at KTU as a central coordinator for citizen science projects, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration. 
  • Practices from Social Citizen Science Projects: Experiences from specific social citizen science projects such as TIME4CS, YouCount, and LibOCS were shared as case studies. 
  • Citizen Science in Architecture and Other Disciplines: Discussions extended to the application of citizen science in architecture and other fields, highlighting innovative approaches to public engagement in data gathering and co-creation. 

The primary challenge addressed during the MML event was “How to enhance public engagement and inclusion of stakeholders to solve societal challenges?” KTU’s long-term vision is to be a university that drives social change and collaborates with society, with a goal of increasing awareness among academic and research staff regarding the benefits of public engagement in research. A short-term goal is to establish a citizen science hub. The workshop’s success was evident in the positive feedback received, indicating its potential to foster future collaboration and drive collective growth. 

Exploring Twinning: Open Science, Engagement, and Ethics at KTU

The Twinning event facilitates the exchange of experiences, best practices, and innovative ideas among CATALISI universities across several key areas: 

  • To present experience in assuring sustainability in research 
  • To present open educational resources and open data (e-library, data center etc.) 
  • To organise the discussion on research ethics practice at KTU 
  • To present to the infrastructure for open science applications. 

The Twinning visit to KTU specifically aimed to share the university’s experience and present its main streams in open science, public engagement in science, and sustainability in research. 

Highlights from the Twinning Event: 

  • Sustainability in Research: Presentations by KTU’s Director of Department of Research Affairs and Head of Research and Innovation Projects Centre introduced research funding schemes and long-term approaches to maintaining research initiatives. 
  • Open Science and Open Data: Discussions at the Centre for Data Analysis and Archiving (DAtA) highlighted the importance of open science for researchers, with a specific focus on the LiDA data archive for social sciences and KTU’s practices for acknowledging data depositing in researcher career assessment. 
  • Open Science and Research Ethics: A meeting with the KTU Research Ethics Committee allowed for discussions on open science practices in Lithuania and at KTU, alongside sharing best practices from ECIU partners. 

Participants from visiting institutions highly valued the opportunity for in-depth discussions and the sharing of experiences. The visit to the DAtA Centre and the sessions on Open Science and Research Ethics were particularly impactful, offering insights into KTU’s innovative structures and programmes.  

Transforming Higher Education Institutions with CATALISI

These events are organised within the context of the CATALISI Capacity building and outreach Acceleration service. They are specifically designed to equip HEIs with the necessary skills and strategies to develop transformative approaches aligned with Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) principles. 

Both the Twinning Exchange and the MML Workshop at KTU were successful in fostering knowledge exchange, facilitating collaboration, and encouraging joint problem-solving. These initiatives are crucial for advancing the change journeys of the participating universities and contribute significantly to the overall mission of CATALISI in 2025 and beyond.